ESI BLOG

National curriculum review
19th January 2014

In the following, published in the Australian soon after the national curriculum review was announced, I briefly outline what a sound curriculum might look like - based on my personal views.

The aim must be a sensible, teacher-friendly curriculum

IN establishing the review of the national curriculum, the Abbott government is fulfilling an election promise and, as someone who has been intimately involved in curriculum development and debates over more than 30 years, it is a privilege to be involved.

The curriculum, along with teacher quality, parenting, student motivation and ability, and a school's culture and ethos, is one of the most significant factors influencing learning outcomes.

As such, it is vital that whatever curriculum is mandated by governments across Australia is academically rigorous, teacher friendly, free of bias and educationally sound.

Such a curriculum should also be benchmarked against international best practice, based on evidence-based research and able to be implemented across a diverse range of school settings and classroom environments.

A viable curriculum also needs to balance what is compulsory across all students and schools with the need to respect diversity and the ability to tailor what is taught to local circumstances and challenges.

Not all schools are the same, not all teachers have the same ability and expertise, and not all students have the same interests, abilities and future career paths.

In a world that is increasingly fragmented, transitory and caught in the here and now, the curriculum needs to introduce students to what is lasting and what forms the common ground on which stability, reciprocity and social cohesion are based.

The curriculum forms an essential part of any culture and the knowledge, understanding, skills and ethical values passed on from generation to generation are critical if communities are to survive and prosper.

As such, any curriculum should be inherently worthwhile as well as serving a variety of more practical and utilitarian ends. The moral, aesthetic and spiritual aspects of education are as important as improving the nation's productivity and ensuring that students have mastered work-related skills and competencies.

The curriculum should also be impartial and disinterested. It should be based on the search for wisdom, understanding and truth.

It is vital any changes to the curriculum are teacher-friendly, cost effective and able to be implemented without adding further to the demands of what is an increasingly difficult and onerous profession.

It is also vital that there be consultation involving teachers, parents and school communities, in addition to the usual professional associations, academics and education bureaucrats, to ensure the curriculum is not divorced from the realities of the classroom. 

 

Responses to this Post

Reply

 

Archived Posts

> Cultural-left rules education
> Fix rowdy classrooms
> Beware the black dog
> Meritocracy good - OK
> Overcoming depression
> Rudd government removing barnacles
> Purpose of education
> Judeo-Christian values ignored
> Myths, fables and legends
> No more victimhood
> Gillard wrong to copy Blair
> Media bias against non-government schools
> Direct Instruction best
> Cultural literacy rules
> UK curriculum back to basics
> Bonus pay for teachers - a bad idea
> Gonski Report released
> Non-government schools in danger
> Gonski a threst to school funding
>
>
> test
> Gillard's education revolution a failure
> School choice good
> Why gays/lesbians should not marry
> Garrett endorses school choice
> Gonski research papers a danger to non-government schools
> School funding and politics of envy
> Wheeler Centre public/private school funding debate
> Julia Gillard fails as Prime Minister
> Mad as a cut snake as insulting as meow!
> Wheeler Centre school funding debate
> Gillard budget 'F' for education
> Non-government schools deserve funding
> Rude students destroy teaching
> PM Julia Gillard not a social conservative
> My School 2.0 will be used to cut funding to non-government schools
> Gillard cannot be trusted on school funding
> 'F' for teaching standards
> Australia - celebrate Western heritage and Christian tradition
> Rudd/Gillard education revolution - fail!
> Non-government schools promote equity
> Non-government schools promote equity and success
> Faith based schools have the right to discriminate
> National curriculum should not be compulsory
> Gillard Government drops education revolution
> Gillard cannot hide her socialist past
> Gillard's funding promise cannot be believed
> Myths and lies about school funding
> Give all schools autonomy and promote school choice
> ALP can't be trusted on school funding
> Islamic curriculum one sided and biased
> Julia Gillard's Geography new-age and PC
> Julia Gillard left-wing and as guilty as Rudd
> Julia Gillard - political opportunist
> History wars
> ALP's education revolution flawed and counter-productive
> New York example has failed
> national testing educationally unsound
> High social mobility in OZ
> I often have doubts about..
> History curriculum PC and dumbed down
> national curriculum English C+
> Gillard refuses to support non-government schools
> testing and ranking schools is flawed
> Similar to Australia, where many..
> School league tables bad
> Published in Education Review..
> Is there an educationa..
> In the following article posted..
> The problem of badly behaved students..
> Extract from book in Weekend Australian..
> School autonomy the way to go
> Julia Gillard, the Commonwealth..
> Why I left the lefties
> Why I am a conservative
> Why the Bishop is wrong on faith and rights

Sign in and have your say

Email:
Password:
Register

Latest Blog

19th January 2014

In the following, published in the Australian soon after the national curriculum review was announced, I briefly outline what a sound curriculum might look like - based on my personal views. ...
Read Full Post!

Shop

$20.00 plus $6 postage
(within Australia).

Latest News

School discipline
17th July 2014
The ABC and the Fairfax Press argue I want to reintroduce corporal punishment to schools - wrong.  See below published in the Herald Sun.The fact is, the days of hitting schoolkids are long gon...

Read entire article...

Sign up to our Newsletter...

donate